=548;	課程說明：
<br>本學期的課程主要分為三大部分。第一部分為熟悉言談分析領域的常用術語；第二部分為熟悉這個
<br>言談分析在學位論文中的研究主題；第三部分為熟悉這個言談分析在期刊論文中的論證方式，以及
<br>從實際錄影中找到案例。在每一周上課之前，修課及旁聽同學需先將該週的指定閱讀文章讀完，並
<br>講述文章中的重點並錄影，在該週上課五天前上傳至課程平台。上課時討論文章的難點及重新歸納
<br>重點，在下課前完成上網提問。學期末綜合一學期所閱讀及討論的內容，寫成一篇文獻回顧作為期
<br>末報告。
<br>
<br>=548;	指定用書：
<br>Liddicoat, A. (2011). An introduction to conversation analysis. London; New 
<br>York : Continuum.
<br>
<br>
<br>=548;	參考書籍：
<br>Shei, Chris (ed). (2019). The Routledge handbook of Chinese discourse 
<br>analysis. New York, NY : Routledge.
<br>Sidnell, J., Stivers, T. (eds.) (2013). The handbook or conversation 
<br>analysis. Chichester, West Sussex, UK : Wiley-Blackwell. 
<br>Woodside, A. G. (2016). Case study research : core skill sets in using 15 
<br>genres. Emerald Group Publishing.
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>=548;	教學方式：
<br>每次上課前由授課教師彙整同學上傳的影片後，於課程一開始先給予回饋；接下來，由授課教師以
<br>連貫的觀點帶領同學一起重新歸納該週討論文章的重點；然後由同學提出對於該文章問題；最後在
<br>回覆提問之後結束該週課程。
<br>
<br>
<br>=548;	教學進度：
<br>Week 1:
<br>Raymond, Geoffrey. (2000). The structure of responding: Type-conforming and 
<br>nonconforming responses to yes/no-type interrogatives. Thesis (Ph.D.)--
<br>University of California, Los Angeles.
<br>
<br>Week 2:
<br>Chap 1: Conversation and Conversation Analysis
<br>
<br>Week 3:
<br>Chap 2: Collecting Conversational Data
<br>
<br>Week 4:
<br>Chap 3: Transcribing Conversation
<br>
<br>Week 5:
<br>Park, Ji Seon. (2008). Negative yes/no question-answer sequences in 
<br>conversation: Grammar, action, and sequence organization. Thesis (Ph.D.)--
<br>University of California, Los Angeles.
<br>
<br>Week 6:
<br>Chap 4: Analyzing Conversational Data
<br>
<br>Week 7:
<br>Chap 5: Turn-taking in Conversation
<br>
<br>Week 8:
<br>Chap 7: Adjacency Pairs and Preference Organization
<br>
<br>Week 9:
<br>Lee, Seung-Hee. (2006). Requests and responses in calls for service. Thesis 
<br>(Ph.D.)--University of California, Los Angeles.
<br>
<br>Week 10:
<br>Turk, Monica J. (2006). Projection in Mandarin Chinese conversation: Grammar 
<br>and social interaction in question-answer sequences. Thesis (Ph.D.)--
<br>University of California, Santa Barbara.  
<br>
<br>Week 11:
<br>Verbiest, Agnes. (1989). Confrontation in conversations: The adjacency pair 
<br>as a tool of the desc<x>riptive component of a Pragma-dialectical analysis. 
<br>Argumentation, Vol.3(4), 395-400.
<br>
<br>Week 12:
<br>Tsui, A. B. M. (1989). Beyond the adjacency pair. Language in Society, 
<br>Vol.18(4), 545-564.
<br>
<br>Week 13:
<br>Varela Su&#225;rez, Ana. (2018). The questionR08;answer adjacency pair in dementia 
<br>discourse. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, Vol.28(1), pp.86-
<br>101.
<br>
<br>Week 14:
<br>Hester, Sally. (2016). Answering questions instead of telling stories: 
<br>Everyday breaching in a family meal. Journal of Pragmatics, Vol.102, 54-66.
<br>
<br>Week 15:
<br>Loredo, R., Kamienkowski, J. E., Jaichenco, V. (2019). Rapid Access to 
<br>Scalar Implicatures in Adjacency Pair Contexts: Experimental Evidence in 
<br>Spanish. Languages, Vol.4(3), p.48.
<br>
<br>Week 16:
<br>王文龍  (2013)。漢語口語教材中會話對答結構類型的表現分析。華文教學與研究, Issue 04, 
<br>65-74.
<br>王文龍 (2013)。中高級漢語口語教材中的不合意應答。雲南師範大學學報：對外漢語教學與研究
<br>版, Issue 02, 64-70.
<br>
<br>Week 17:
<br>李崇月 ; 曾 (2010)。漢語古詩詞中的話語輪換及其翻譯。貴州大學學報（社會科學版）, 
<br>Vol. 28(4), 127-131.
<br>許炳坤 (2009)。英語電視新聞訪談中的衝突話語分析。外語學刊, Vol.2009, Issue 1, 98-
<br>100.
<br>張治 (2016)。漢語同意應答語的情緒傾向。海外華文教育, Issue 06, 781-788.
<br>
<br>Week 18:
<br>梅迎春 (2015). 從語用能力的合作原則談郵輪乘務英語中的相鄰對. 青島遠洋船員職業學院學
<br>報, Vol.36(03), pp.75-78.
<br>謝旭慧 (2013). 喜劇小品的會話結構分析。上饒師範學院學報, Vol.33(02), 39-42.
<br>
<br>
<br>=548;	成績考核：
<br>(1)	閱讀重點影片上傳  50%
<br>(2)	每週下課前提問  25%
<br>(3)	期末報告 25%
<br>