課程說明：
本課程著重在培養選修學生於詮釋臺灣語言實驗所得結果之能力，尤其是在語言實驗中所牽
涉到的大腦相關部位。課程中從相關語言實驗的結果與討論深入探究，再以共同研討的方式，拓展
學生作為研究者對即時語言運作想像的細緻程度。
修課學生以曾做過臺灣語言即時實驗的經驗為佳，課程中將實際從修課同學做過的臺灣語言
實驗結果切入，並與文獻中的結果進行比較和討論。為評估學生詮釋實驗結果的能力是否在課程中
得到增強，將輔以期中考和期末考現場考試客觀評估。
教學方式：
(1) 教師帶領辯論
(2) 教師給予思考方向，讓學生去閱讀、收集資料，並在課程中辯論
成績考核：
(1) 修課及旁聽的學生帶領討論 40%
(2) 參與討論 20%
(3) 期中考 20%
(4) 期末考 20%
教學進度：
Week 1: Neocortical processing of spoken language
Week 2: Functional significance of the semantic P600
Week 3: Covert auditory attention
Week 4: Semantic comprehension
Week 5: Chinese bilinguals
Week 6: Effects of orthographic consistency and homophone density
Week 7: Sentence integration
Week 8: Speech perception
Week 9: Oscillatory dynamics of cortical functional connections
Week 10: Processing of scalar inferences
Week 11: Mechanistic language circuits
Week 12: Native-like brain processing
Week 13: Second language syntactic processing
Week 14: Semantic context effect
Week 15: Hierarchical linguistic structures
Week 16: Contingency judgement
Week 17: Interacting linguistic and perceptual subsystems
Week 18: Temporal presuppositions
閱讀文章：
Augurzky, P., Franke, M., & Ulrich, R. (2019). Gricean Expectations in
Online Sentence Comprehension: An ERP Study on the Processing of Scalar
Inferences. Cognitive science, 43(8), e12776. https://doi-org.nthulib-
oc.nthu.edu.tw/10.1111/cogs.12776
Benedict, R. H., Shucard, D. W., Santa Maria, M. P., Shucard, J. L., Abara,
J. P., Coad, M. L., Wack, D., Sawusch, J., & Lockwood, A. (2002). Covert
auditory attention generates activation in the rostral/dorsal anterior
cingulate cortex. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 14(4), 637–645.
https://doi-org.nthulib-oc.nthu.edu.tw/10.1162/08989290260045765
Bowden, H. W., Steinhauer, K., Sanz, C., & Ullman, M. T. (2013). Native-like
brain processing of syntax can be attained by university foreign language
learners. Neuropsychologia, 51(13), 2492–2511. https://doi-org.nthulib-
oc.nthu.edu.tw/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.09.004
Caffarra, S., Molinaro, N., Davidson, D., & Carreiras, M. (2015). Second
language syntactic processing revealed through event-related potentials: an
empirical review. Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 51, 31–47.
https://doi-org.nthulib-oc.nthu.edu.tw/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.01.010
Chen, W. F., Chao, P. C., Chang, Y. N., Hsu, C. H., & Lee, C. Y. (2016).
Effects of orthographic consistency and homophone density on Chinese spoken
word recognition. Brain and language, 157-158, 51–62. https://doi-
org.nthulib-oc.nthu.edu.tw/10.1016/j.bandl.2016.04.005
Ding, N., Melloni, L., Zhang, H., Tian, X., & Poeppel, D. (2016). Cortical
tracking of hierarchical linguistic structures in connected speech. Nature
neuroscience, 19(1), 158–164. https://doi-org.nthulib-
oc.nthu.edu.tw/10.1038/nn.4186
Fonteneau, E., Bozic, M., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2015). Brain Network
Connectivity During Language Comprehension: Interacting Linguistic and
Perceptual Subsystems. Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 25(10), 3962
–3976. https://doi-org.nthulib-oc.nthu.edu.tw/10.1093/cercor/bhu283
Frishkoff, G. A., Tucker, D. M., Davey, C., & Scherg, M. (2004). Frontal and
posterior sources of event-related potentials in semantic comprehension.
Brain research. Cognitive brain research, 20(3), 329–354. https://doi-
org.nthulib-oc.nthu.edu.tw/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.02.009
Heisz, J. J., Hannah, S., Shedden, J. M., & Allan, L. G. (2011). Neural
temporal dynamics of contingency judgement. The Quarterly Journal of
Experimental Psychology, 64(4), 792–806. https://doi-org.nthulib-
oc.nthu.edu.tw/10.1080/17470218.2010.517322
Jouravlev, O., Stearns, L., Bergen, L., Eddy, M., Gibson, E., & Fedorenko,
E. (2016). Processing temporal presuppositions: An event-related potential
study. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(10), 1245–1256. https://doi-
org.nthulib-oc.nthu.edu.tw/10.1080/23273798.2016.1209531
Liu, Y., & Perfetti, C. A. (2003). The time course of brain activity in
reading English and Chinese: an ERP study of Chinese bilinguals. Human brain
mapping, 18(3), 167–175. https://doi-org.nthulib-
oc.nthu.edu.tw/10.1002/hbm.10090
Mamashli, F., Khan, S., Obleser, J., Friederici, A. D., & Maess, B. (2019).
Oscillatory dynamics of cortical functional connections in semantic
prediction. Human brain mapping, 40(6), 1856–1866. https://doi-org.nthulib-
oc.nthu.edu.tw/10.1002/hbm.24495
Pulvermüller, F., Shtyrov, Y., & Hauk, O. (2009). Understanding in an
instant: neurophysiological evidence for mechanistic language circuits in
the brain. Brain and language, 110(2), 81–94. https://doi-org.nthulib-
oc.nthu.edu.tw/10.1016/j.bandl.2008.12.001
Shen, W., Fiori-Duharcourt, N., & Isel, F. (2016). Functional significance
of the semantic P600: evidence from the event-related brain potential source
localization. NeuroReport: For Rapid Communication of Neuroscience Research,
27(7), 548–558. https://doi-org.nthulib-
oc.nthu.edu.tw/10.1097/WNR.0000000000000583
Shtyrov, Y., & Lenzen, M. (2017). First-pass neocortical processing of
spoken language takes only 30 msec: Electrophysiological evidence. Cognitive
Neuroscience, 8(1), 24–38. https://doi-org.nthulib-
oc.nthu.edu.tw/10.1080/17588928.2016.1156663
Trébuchon, A., Démonet, J. F., Chauvel, P., & Liégeois-Chauvel, C. (2013).
Ventral and dorsal pathways of speech perception: an intracerebral ERP
study. Brain and language, 127(2), 273–283. https://doi-org.nthulib-
oc.nthu.edu.tw/10.1016/j.bandl.2013.04.007
Van Petten, C. (2014). Examining the n400 semantic context effect item-by-
item: Relationship to corpus-based measures of word co-occurrence.
International Journal of Psychophysiology, 94(3), 407–419. https://doi-
org.nthulib-oc.nthu.edu.tw/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.10.012
Yang, C. L., Perfetti, C. A., & Liu, Y. (2010). Sentence integration
processes: an ERP study of Chinese sentence comprehension with relative
clauses. Brain and language, 112(2), 85–100. https://doi-org.nthulib-
oc.nthu.edu.tw/10.1016/j.bandl.2009.10.005