EMD 800800
Management of Knowledge and Organizational Behavior
Instructors:
林福仁教授、劉玉雯教授
Introduction:
This course consists of two subjects: knowledge management and organizational
behavior. Two instructors will convey their domain expertise on these two subjects
via case teaching, discussion, and lecture. Knowledge management covers topics in
knowledge creation, organizational learning, KM systems, and AI in knowledge
management. Organizational Behavior covers topics in rewards, motivation,
communication and negotiation, teams, leadership, employee selection and
migration.

objectives:
After completing this course consisting of knowledge management and organizational
behavior, students are expected to demonstrate the following learning outcomes:
1. Be familiar with the major concepts of organizational behavior and issues that
managers encounter, and with principles, practices and models that help managers
deal with these issues.
2. Be able to see how the relationships among people within an organization and
relationships among organizations influence organizational effectiveness.
3. Understand the knowledge creating, acquisition, encoding, and retrieval within
and among organizations.
4. Understand the role of technology played in knowledge management and
organizational learning.

I. Classroom Participation (30%)

In-class Discussion

The learning experience in a course like this one depends heavily on each student
being prepared to actively participate in every class session. Positive
participation includes attendance, active involvement in all in-class exercises
and discussions, and maintenance of a classroom demeanor that encourages the
participation of others. You will be evaluated on the quantity as well as the
quality of your contribution and insights.
II. Individual Assignments (40%)
In addition, closing to the end of every class, each student is required to
summarize what you have learned in our class on that day. The summary should
include both key ideas from each article and your main takeaway from our class
discussion.
III. Case Study (30%)

Questions for each case will be provided before the class. Each student is
required to provide your answers and insights in the reflection paper. The papers
must be double-spaced with one-inch margins and use 12-point font size. No more
than four pages. Bring the paper to class for further group discussions.

Subject 1. Organizational Behavior
Day 1: Session 1 to 3 (Rewards, Motivation, Communication and Negotiation)
Day 2: Session 4 to 6 (Teams, Leadership, Employee selection and migration)

Session 1: Rewards
1. Duncan, W. J. (2001). Stock ownership and work motivation. Organizational
Dynamics, 30(1), p.1-11.
2. Case, J. (2001). When salaries aren’t secret. Harvard Business Review,
79(5), p.37-43. (HBR Case)
3. Erickson, Tamara J.; Gratton, Lynda. (2007). What It Means to Work Here.
Harvard Business Review, Vol. 85,Issue 3, p104-112
4. Desai, M. (2012). The incentive bubble. Harvard Business Review, 90(3),
124-132
5. Zenger, Todd. (2016). The Case Against Pay Transparency. Harvard Business
Review, p1-6. 6p.
Additional readings:
Cullen 2018_The Motivating (and Demotivating) Effects of Learning Others’
Salaries


Session 2: Motivation
1. McClelland, D. C., & Burnham, D. H. (1995). Power Is the Great Motivator.
Harvard Business Review, 73(1), 126-13
2. Nicholson, N. (2003). How to Motivate Your Problem People? Harvard
Business Review, Vol. 81 Issue 1, p57-65
3. Nohria, N., Groysberg, B., & Lee, L.-E. (2008). Employee Motivation.
Harvard Business Review, Vol. 86 Issue 7/8, p78-84
4. Steenburgh, T., & Ahearne, M. (2012). Motivating Salespeople: What Really
Works. Harvard Business Review, 90(7/8), 70-75.
5. Graziano, N. (2019). The leader as coach. Harvard Business Review,
November-December, 111-119.
6. Williams J.C. & Mihaylo, S. (2019). How the best bosses interrupt bias on
their teams? Harvard Business Review, November-December, 151-155.
7. Knight, R. (2019). How to Motivate Your Team During Crunch Time? Harvard
Business Review, November-December, 2-7.
Additional readings:
Sean Graber (2015) The Two Sides of Employee Engagement. Harvard Business
Review.


Session 3: Communication and Negotiation
1. Tannen, D. (1985). The power of talk: Who gets heard and why? Harvard
Business Review, 73(5), 138-148.
2. Sebenius, J. K. (1992). Negotiation analysis: A characterization and
review. Management Science, 38(1), 18-38.
3. Maurice E. Schweitzer and Jeffrey L. Kerr (2000). Bargaining under the
Influence: The Role of Alcohol in Negotiations. The Academy of Management
Executive, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 47-57
4. Williams, Gary A.; Miller, R.B. (2002). Change the Way You Persuade.
Harvard Business Review, Vol. 80 Issue 5, p65-73
5. Porath, C., & Pearson, C. (2013). The price of incivility. Harvard
Business Review, 91(1), 114-121.
6. Bernstein E. & Waber B. (2019). The truth about open offices. Harvard
Business Review, November-December, 83-91.
Additional readings:
1. Jeong et al (2019). Being nice in a negotiation can backfire.
2. Chris Voss. Never split the difference: Negotiating as if your life
depended on it.
3. Voss C. (2020, July 23). Communication Skills: 3 Ways to Make “No” Work
For You. The Black Swan Group Blog: The Negotiation Edge.
https://blog.blackswanltd.com/the-edge/3-ways-to-make-no-work-for-you
4. Talksalks at Google. (2016, May 23). Never Split the Difference, Chris
Voss (video). YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=guZa7mQV1l0&t=361s


Session 4: Teams
1. Wetlaufer, S. (1994). The team that wasn’t. Harvard Business Review,
72(6), 281-284.
2. Eisenhardt, K. M., Kahwajy, J. L., & Bourgeois, L. J. (1997). How
management teams can have a good fight. Harvard business review, 75, 77-86.
3. Hinds, P., Carley, K., Krackhardt, D.and Wholey, D. (2000). Choosing Work
Group Members: Balancing Similarity, Competence and Familiarity. Organizational
Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 81: 226-251.
4. Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (2005). The discipline of teams. Harvard
Business Review, 83(7), 162.
5. Kotler, P., Rackham, N., & Krishnaswamy, S. (2006). Ending the war between
sales and marketing. Harvard Business Review, 84(7/8), 68.
6. Kirby, Julia; Buckingham, Marcus; Bischmann, Joanne, Kolind, Lars, &
Blomquist, Tomas. (2006). Just Trying to Help. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 84
Issue 6, p35-39 (HBR Case)
7. Fryer, B., Craddock, M., Thayer, D., & Kolb, D. (2008). When Your
Colleague Is a Saboteur. Harvard Business Review (November), p. 41-54.
Additional readings:
1. Boards. (2020). Another reason to push for fedmale directors, Harvard
Business Review, March- April, 2020
2. Lisa B. Kwan (March–April 2019). The Collaboration Blind Spot. Harvard
Business Review.


Session 5: Leadership
1. Janice R. W. Joplin and Catherine S. Daus (1997). Challenges of Leading a
Diverse Workforce. The Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 32-47
2. Kotter, J. P. (1990). What leaders really do. Harvard Business Review,
68(3), 103-111.
3. Goleman, D. (2000). Leadership that gets results. Harvard Business Review,
78(2), 78-90.
4. Khurana, R. (2002). The curse of the superstar CEO. Harvard Business
Review, 80(9), 60-65.
5. McNulty, Eric J.; Dunne III, James J.; Marcus, Leonard J. (2010). The CEO
Can't Afford to Panic. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 88 Issue 3, p121-125(HBR
Case)
6. Edelman, Russ; Hiltabiddle, Tim. (2006). The Nice Guy. Harvard Business
Review, V84(2), p21-31.
7. Finkelstein, S. (2019). The best leaders are great teachers, Harvard
Business Review, Winter, 54-58.
8. Likierman, S.A. (2020). The elements of good judgment, Harvard Business
Review, January-February, 103-111.

Session 6: Employee selection and migration
1. Cappelli, Peter (2000). A Market-Driven Approach to Retaining Talent.
Harvard Business Review, Vol. 7 Issue 1, p103-111,
2. Cespedes, F. V., Gardner, A., Kerr, S., & Kelley, R. D. (2006). Old Hand
or New Blood? Harvard Business Review, 84(7/8), p.28-40.
3. Coutu, D. (2007). We googled you. Harvard Business Review, 85(6), p.37-47.
4. Lawler III, Edward E.; Pringle, Anna; Branham, F. Leigh; Cornelius, Jim;
Martin, Jean. (2008). Why Are We Losing All Our Good People? Harvard Business
Review, Vol. 86 Issue 6, p41-51 (HBR Case)
5. Martin, Jean & Schmidt, Conrad (2010). How to Keep Your Top Talent?
Harvard Business Review, Vol. 88 Issue 5, p54-61

Subject 2. Knowledge Management
Day 3. Knowledge management and organizational learning
Day 4. Technology-enabled knowledge management

Topic 1. Knowledge Creation: SECI Model
Readings.
1. Nonaka, I. – Takeuchi, H. (1995): Knowledge–Creating Company. New York: Oxford
University Press.
2. Nonaka, I. (2007). Knowledge creating company, Harvard Business Review,
https://hbr.org/2007/07/the-knowledge-creating-company
3. Nonaka, I. (2012) Creating new knowledge the Japanese way, Harvard Business
Review, https://store.hbr.org/product/creating-new-knowledge-the-japanese-
way/IIR083
4. Adesina, A.O. & Ocholla, D.O. & The SECI Model in Knowledge Management
Practices: Past, Present and Future, Mousaion: South African Journal of
Information Studies https://upjournals.co.za/index.php/LIS,Volume 37 | Number 3 |
2019 | #6557 | 34 pages
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340165842_The_SECI_Model_in_Knowledge_Man
agement_Practices

Topic 2. Organizational Learning
Readings.
1. Lin, F.-R. & Lin, S.C. (2001). A conceptual model for virtual organizational
learning, Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 11(3), 155-
178.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254579661_A_Conceptual_Model_for_Virtual_
Organizational_Learning
2. Wegner, D.M. (1987). Transactive memory: a contemporary analysis of the group
mind, In Mullen, B. & Goethals, G.R. (Eds.) Theories of Group Behavior (Chapter
9). pp 185-208.
3. El-Awad, Z. (2019). From individuals to the organization A transactive memory
system perspective on multilevel entrepreneurial learning, The Learning
Organization 26(6), pp. 617-630.
(https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/TLO-04-2018-0069/full/pdf?
casa_token=7IhW3n0ezPsAAAAA:A_SIXlzxv1nfYLjrIITkdra3LSYnZd7SwWdSNGO2vnB2Unjd_6Z3xv
Cl8nafC09rKmr9LP9sROHpPs0Omm7o_cLZ02ZABYFfxpthz05zqtMlkmZdBbPa)

Topic 3. Knowledge Management System
Readings.
1. Becerra-Fernandez, I. & Sabherwal, R. (2015). Knowledge Management: Systems and
Processes. Routledge, New York.
2. Lakanani, K.R. (2009). Innocentive.com (A). Harvard Business School.
3. Chaurasia, S.S., Kaul, N., Yadav, B. and Shukla, D. (2020). Open innovation for
sustainability through creating shared value-role of knowledge management system,
openness and organizational structure, Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(10),
pp. 2491-2511.

Topic 4. Artificial Intelligence and Human Intelligence
Readings.
1. Lin, F.-R. and Liang, C.H. (2017). Storyline-based summarization for news topic
retrospection, Decision Support System, 45 (2008) 473–490
2. Korteling, J.E., van de Boer-Visschedijk, G.C., Blankendaal, R.A.M., Boonekamp,
R.C., and Eikelboom, A.R. (2021). Human- versus Artificial Intelligence, Frontiers
in Artificial Intelligence, Volume 4.
(https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frai.2021.622364/full)
3. Roitblet, ()AI Is No Match for the Quirks of Human Intelligence, The MIT Press
Reader, (https://thereader.mitpress.mit.edu/ai-insight-problems-quirks-human-
intelligence/)